The 2012 Farmland law does not protect either smallholder farmers or real farmers. Moreover, it
cannot resolve the current land disputes. It is a law that encourages businessmen, companies and
land confiscation. The Bill to amend the 2012 Farmland law will neither protect the farmers nor be
effective at all. The current lands laws do not respect customary right to land in ethnic areas at all.
Thus, a new farmland law must be developed instead of amending the 2012 Farmland law, that
respects, protects and promotes the rights of small-holder farmers across the country.
Thus, while we welcome any initiative to revise the current Farmland Law, we feel very strongly that
the nature and character of the currently proposed amendments are not what is needed. They fail to
address the true weaknesses of the existing law and at the same time they move regulation of land
even further in the wrong direction.
Thus, while we welcome any initiative to revise the current Farmland Law, we feel very strongly that the nature and character of the currently proposed amendments are not what is needed. They fail to address the true weaknesses of the existing law and at the same time they move regulation of land even further in the wrong direction.
Read the full LIOH’s position & feedback on the Farmland Law (English) (Burmese p.1-6; Burmese p.7-12).
Read . . . LIOH’s Statement on the Farmland Law Amendments
From 17-19 July 2017 in Yangon, we, the members of Land In Our Hands network-
(90) representatives from (48) organizations of each and every State and Region — discussed
and analyzed the 16 points Farmland law amendment bill published in The Mirror daily
newspaper on 16th June 2017 for public consultation; and have issued the following
1. In our consideration, the existing 2012 Farmland Law and the 2012 Vacant, Fallow,
Virgin Land Law have been drafted without meaningful consultation or getting the
(informed) opinion and consent of the farmers who are 70% of the population of the
country. These laws also have neglected the customary land tenure of ethnic
nationalities as well as the important cultural and historical values of land and
intended to consider land as a commodity for buying and selling, resulting in further
complication and worsening of the current land issues. For example, amending the
provisions about seasonal crops can be interpreted as favoring project crops, so we
consider these as dangerous amendments. In addition, this law to amend the current
farmland law does not comply with and does go against the National Land Use Policy
(2016), so we find the amendment law to be a backtracking amendment with the
effect of moving backward and undermining the NLUP.
2. Since current laws have been developed without the consent of the farmers and
communities, they do not provide protection for land tenure and social security of the
farmers. This process of reforming the current laws in turn has been a rushed and
driven one, so the plan to do a consultation for farmland law amendment poses the
danger/risk to make current land disputes and issues even more complicated.
3. We strongly object to the fact that this farmland law amendment draft hearing session
in the parliament will not gain any effective changes at all, since public-elected
parliamentarians have not gone through any activities to listen to the voice, opinions
and desires of the farmers and the communities.
4. Essentially, we earnestly demand that the timeframe for public hearing of farmland
law amendment draft be modified so that the opinions, perspectives and independent
recommendations of the farmers and communities can be incorporated into the
farmland law amendment process.
5. We want to meet and discuss our findings and analysis with the parliamentarians prior to any discussion or hearing of farmland law amendment bill.
(Download the statement in Burmese or English)
Read . . . LIOH’s Position & Feedback on the Farmland Law & Amendments