20 June 2021

Prioritize the provision of humanitarian aid through local civil society and community-based organizations

On the occasion of the World Refugee Day, 488 civil society organizations call on the United Nations and international community to ensure that provision of humanitarian aid is not weaponized by the junta in their campaign of terror against the people of Myanmar. To avoid this, the UN agencies, international donors and humanitarian organizations must prioritize the provision of humanitarian aid through local civil society and humanitarian organizations, ethnic service providers, including cross-border aid, to best support those affected by the humanitarian and human rights crisis unfolding in Myanmar as a direct result of the military’s brutal attacks following its unlawful coup attempt on February 1. The groups also call on countries neighboring Myanmar to protect the rights of refugees fleeing the military’s violence.

Over a quarter of a million people have been displaced in ethnic areas since the start of the Myanmar military’s failed coup. The military junta has repeatedly impeded the delivery of humanitarian assistance to those in need. They are thus using the dire humanitarian situation of those who have been displaced to weaponize humanitarian aid, withholding it as part of their campaign of terror.

Under international humanitarian law, all parties to the conflict must “facilitate the free passage of humanitarian assistance.” Contravening this, the military has blocked humanitarian aid from being delivered to many ethnic areas while deliberately destroying people’s food storage including in Karen, Kachin, Karenni, Chin and Shan States. The most salient case was the 8 June burning of rice, medicine and other essential humanitarian aid, as well as the vehicle carrying the aid that was on its way to Pekhon Township where some of the 100,000 Karenni IDPs have been sheltering. “Willfully impeding relief supplies” as a tactic of starvation is considered a method of warfare and is a war crime. In addition, the military has targeted and intimidated humanitarian aid workers and volunteers, killing, injuring, arbitrarily arresting and torturing those who work on the frontlines.

COVID-19 has added another layer of insecurity in the already deteriorating human rights and humanitarian crisis, as rising cases lead to lockdowns in towns across Myanmar. The military had been weaponizing COVID-19 to crack down on prodemocracy activists, human rights defenders and journalists prior to the coup. In keeping with this pattern, the junta has seized on the opportunity to leverage the administration of vaccines to crack down on the Civil Disobedience Movement (CDM). Worsening the humanitarian crisis compounded by COVID-19, in Hpa-An, Karen State, junior doctors have been urged to leave the CDM in order to receive their second dose of the vaccine. They received their first dose before the coup but refused to take the second vaccine under such conditions.

Meanwhile, activists and supporters of the Spring Revolution, as well as ethnic people who are under threat from the military’s airstrikes and artillery shelling continue to attempt to escape the military’s violence but have not been able to seek refuge in neighboring countries of Thailand and India. In Thailand, refugees who seek temporary refuge have been unable to access the assistance of the UNHCR and INGOs. Instead, they have been sent back to Karen State where they continue to face the threat of attacks by the Myanmar military.

Let us be reminded on this day that the current mass human rights and humanitarian crisis unfolding in Myanmar was triggered and has been shaped by the brutal, violent, unrelenting, murderous, and oppressive actions of the Myanmar military. This is the same military that committed genocide against the Rohingya in Rakhine State and has been committing war crimes and crimes against humanity in ethnic areas for decades. The extreme and heinous violence has been committed by one side, led by a criminal who must be tried and held to account for grave international crimes. It disheartens those who have made immense sacrifices to protect and promote the values and principles of humanity when humanitarianism is used to mask the absence of action to address the root causes and hold accountable the perpetrators of the humanitarian crisis. Lending legitimacy to this junta is counterproductive to ending this humanitarian crisis and goes against the wishes of those who are sacrificing so much to resist and can even further embolden and enable this junta to carry on with its terror acts.

The United Nations and international community must focus its work on assisting local CSOs, particularly the ethnic service providers, to address the current human rights and humanitarian crisis. The neighboring countries and ASEAN must protect the people fleeing from Myanmar to seek refuge and cooperate with the UN and international community. The regional CSOs’ support and solidarity in this struggle has been vital and strengthens our resolve to continue to resist the brutal military junta.

On World Refugee Day, we must listen to the voices of refugees worldwide and recognize and strengthen their agency and the role of those displaced inside Myanmar and outside, the local hosts and ethnic service providers that continue to assist them, often at great personal risk. The current unfolding crisis in Myanmar may be one of the biggest challenges they have faced. However, they have served the needs of their communities under the iron fist of previous military rule and decades of offensives by the same military, and now they continue to uphold the values of humanity, dignity, and rights with courage while having to endure immense suffering. As neighboring countries refuse to take in refugees, turning them away at the border without adequate assistance, it is the local CSOs who have stepped in to fill the void, despite limited resources and constraints placed by the military. They deserve nothing less than our full support and genuine partnership.

We call on the United Nations and international community to:
* Ensure that provision of humanitarian aid does not legitimize the military and does not enable the military to further weaponize humanitarian aid in their campaign of terror;
* Recognize the role of and provide humanitarian assistance through local service providing civil society and community-based organizations, including cross-border aid;
* Take direction from and consult and collaborate with the National Unity Government and ethnic armed organizations in provision of aid;
* Disengage from working relations with the junta in the provision of humanitarian aid;
* Provide flexible and timely funds and resources to local civil society and community-based organizations that have robust and effective systems for providing emergency support;
* Urge neighboring countries to protect the rights of refugees by allowing them to take refuge and access to UNHCR and INGOs as well as humanitarian organizations for their immediate and unimpeded assistance.

Signed by 488 civil society organizations including:

  1. African Great Lakes Action Network
  2. American Baptist Churches of Nebraska
  3. American Baptist Churches USA
  4. Arakan American Community (AAC)
  5. Arakan Watch
  6. Burma Human Rights Network
  7. Burma Task Force
  8. Burmese Rohingya Organisation UK (BROUK)
  9. Calgary Karen Community Association (CKCA)
  10. California Karen Youth Forum
  11. Canadian Rohingya Development Initiative
  12. Chin Baptist Churches USA
  13. Coalition of Rohingya Organisations in Malaysia
  14. Crescent Hill Baptist Church in Louisville, KY
  15. DEEKU, the Karenni Community, USA
  16. Edmonton Karen Community Youth Organization
  17. European Karen Network
  18. Finland Karen Culture Association
  19. Free Burma Campaign (South Africa)
  20. Ignite Ministry, Inc
  21. International Karen Organisation
  22. Kachin Alliance
  23. Kachin Peace Network
  24. Kansas Karenni community, KS, USA
  25. Karen Association of Huron, SD, USA
  26. Karen Community of Akron, OH, USA
  27. Karen Community of Canada (KCC)
  28. Karen Community of Czech Republic
  29. Karen Community of Finland
  30. Karen Community of Hamilton
  31. Karen Community of Iowa, IA, USA
  32. Karen Community of Ireland
  33. Karen Community of Israel
  34. Karen Community of Kansas City, KS & MO, USA
  35. Karen Community of Kitchener & Waterloo
  36. Karen Community of Leamington
  37. Karen Community of Lethbridge
  38. Karen Community of London
  39. Karen Community of Minnesota, MN, USA
  40. Karen Community of North Carolina, NC, USA
  41. Karen Community of Ottawa
  42. Karen Community of Regina
  43. Karen Community of Rock Island, IL, USA
  44. Karen Community of Saskatoon
  45. Karen Community of Syracuse, USA
  46. Karen Community of Thunderbay
  47. Karen Community of Toronto
  48. Karen Community of Windsor
  49. Karen Community of Winnipeg
  50. Karen Community Society of British Columbia (KCSBC)
  51. Karen Organization of America
  52. Karen Organization of San Diego
  53. Karen Peace Support Network
  54. Karen Swedish Community
  55. Karen Youth Education Pathways
  56. Karen Youth of Norway
  57. Karen Youth of Toronto
  58. Karen Youth Organization
  59. Karenni Community of Bowling Green, KY, USA
  60. Karenni community of Des Moines, IA, USA
  61. Karenni Community of Georgia, GA, USA
  62. Karenni community of Indianapolis, IN, USA
  63. Karenni Community of Massachusetts, MA, USA
  64. Karenni community of Minnesota, MN, USA
  65. Karenni Community of Missouri, MO, USA
  66. Karenni Community of New York, NY, USA
  67. Karenni Community of North Carolina, NC, USA
  68. Karenni Community of Portland, OR, USA
  69. Karenni Community of Taxes, TX, USA
  70. Karenni Community of Wisconsin, WI, USA
  71. Karenni National Women’s Organization
  72. Karenni Refugee Committee
  73. Karenni Refugee Committee
  74. Karenni Society of Minnesota, MN, USA
  75. Korea Karen Organization
  76. Korea Karen Youth Organization
  77. Never Again Coalition
  78. Oversea Karen Organization Japan
  79. Progressive Voice
  80. Rohingya American Society
  81. Rohingya Arakanese Refugee Committee
  82. Rohingya Student Network
  83. Rohingya Women Development Forum
  84. The Sound of Hope
  85. The Urban Village
  86. US Campaign for Burma
  87. Utica Karen Community, NY, US

Note: Due to serious security concerns, names of 401 local civil society organizations who endorsed and signed this statement cannot be disclosed. The signed CSOs work on range of humanitarian, human rights protection, and rights-based issues in Myanmar.

For further information, please contact:
* Khin Ohmar,
* Saw Alex,
* Luiz,

Download PDF in English and Burmese.

Condemnation of the Military’s Coup d’état

February 2, 2021

We strongly condemn the coup d’état by the Military on 1 February 2021 as high treason & armed criminality.

We firmly reject all forms of Fascism, Warlordism, Ultra-nationalism and Authoritarianism.

We demand the immediate release of political detainees and peasant detainees.

We resolutely joining the peoples’ movements towards democracy and human rights.

We resolutely joining the peoples’ movements until the end of Fascism and nullification of the 2008 Constitution.

“Reject Fascism &
Let’s Build Federal Democratic Nation”

Land in Our Hands

Karenni CSOs’ Statement on Action Plan for National Land Law Drafting (September 2020)

Kayah (Karenni) State’s civil society organizations’ statement on the announcement of the Working Committee on the Drafting the National Land Law and Harmonization of the laws related to Land Management on the  National Land Law Action Plan (Draft)

Date: 8th September, 2020

The below points, submitted as suggestions prior to the deadline of September 15th 2020, represent the stance of the civil society organizations of Kayah (Karenni) State regarding the announcement of the Working Committee on the Drafting the National Land Law and Harmonization of the laws related to Land Management on the  National Land Law Action Plan (Draft) of 17th August 2020:

  1. It is crucial that the National Land Law provides genuine protections for the security of the land rights, land management rights, and land ownership of Myanmar nationals, smallholder farmers, indigenous people, subsistence farmers, and grassroots people.
  2. Although it is stated that the National Land Use Policy will be used as a guide for the drafting of a new National Land Law, as the National Land Law will cover all laws concerning land, all actions towards the National Land Law must be reviewed and scrutinized through transparent and inclusive processes.
  3. Before proceeding with drafting the National Land Law, there must be priority given to evaluating and improvingthe present substance, influence and consistency of the National Land Use Policy, that was approved in 2016. Primarily, there must be time taken to review it against human rights standards and; international land, natural resource, and environmental standards, as well as the Myanmar Sustainable Development Plan, the National Environment Policy, and the Union Accords from the Union Peace Conference – 21st Panglong.
  4. The coverage, capacity, independence and genuine representation of those holding responsibilities and authority within the working committees and sub-working groups for producing a new National Land Law must be reviewed.The 2016 National Land Use Policy, the institutions established under this policy; the National Land Use Council, and other working committees; and sub- working groups and supporting working groups and their actions evidence that they have strongly worked to form wholly centralized groups. Thus, we have no confidence and gurantee in the emergence of a genuine National Land Law that will provide protections benefitting all of the stakeholders mentioned in point (1).
  5. The 2016 National Land Use Policy, and all of the presently enacted land management laws lack protections and actions affording respect, recognition; and specific, concrete provisions concerning the management and decision-making rights of ethnic minorities, tribes and indigenous peoples over their customary land management, land, natural resources, and territory. Moreover, there is no trust in the present processes to establish a new National Land Law as the Union Accords and the points covering the whole country relating to the sector of the land and the environment that were signed at the Union Peace Conference – the 21st Panglong have also disregarded the strengthening of recognition and protections for the land rights of local residents, and indigenous people.
  6. In particular, extreme caution must be exercised in taking sensitive, simplistic actions towards the drafting of a National Land Law in a period of implementing national peace, national reconciliation and the establishment of a federal democratic union. Otherwise, it will not only significantly detriment these processes, it will also create new problems.
  7. Therefore, there must be actions, agreements and coordination with all relevant stakeholders to prioritize political transformation and the construction of a genuine federal democratic union. Only then can the land sector be transformed by step by step actions truly oriented towards establishing a genuine federal democratic union.

List of the Kayah (Karenni) States Civil Society Organizations endorsed in issuing the statement

  1. Progressive Karenni People Force (PKPF)
  2. Union of Karenni State Youth (UKSY)
    • Karenni National Youth Organization (KNYO)
    • Karenni State Student Union (KSSU)
    • Kayan Women Organization (KyWO)
    •  Kayan New Generation Youth (KNGY)
  3. Karenni State Ethnic Youth Steering Committee
  4. Karenni Civil Society Network (KCSN)
    • Karenni Ever Green (KEG)
    • Karenni Social Welfare Development Center (KSWDC)
    • Karenni Mobil Health Committee (KnMHC)
    • Karenni Development Research Group (KDRG)
    • Karenni Student Union (KSU)
    • Karenni National Youth Organization (KNYO)
    • Karenni Education Department (KnED)
    • Karenni National Women Organization (KNWO)
    • Karenni Legal and Human Right Center (KLHRC)
    • Karenni Refugee Committee (KnRC)
    • Karenni Literacy and Culture Development  Committee (KLCDC)
  5. Kayah Earthrights Action Network (KEAN)
  6. Myamar Alliance for Transparency and Accountability (Karenni-MATA)
  7. Local Development Network (LDN)
  8. Mizzima Hnalone Thar Youth (Loikaw)
  9. Karenni State Farmer Union (KSFU)
  10. LAIN Technical Supporting Group
  11. Mawduklarmar Social Development Association (MSDA)
  12. Women for Women Foundation (WWF)
  13. Karenni Human Rights Group (KnHRG)
  14. Future Women Association (FWA)
  15. Kayah Baptist Association, Christian Social Service and Development Department (KBA-CSSDD)
  16. Kayah Liphu Youth (KLY)
  17. Kawyaw Youth (KYY)
  18. Kayaw Youth Organization (KYO)
  19. Yintaleh Youth (YY)
  20. New Generation Youth of Karen (Karenni State)
  21. Karenni Mega-Investment Watch (KMIW)
  22. Karenni Land Policy Developing Committee(KLPDC)
  23. Karenni State Youth Network (KSYN)
  24. Karuna Mission Social Solidarity-Loikaw (KMSS-Loikaw)

Download the Statement in English and Myanmar.

Statement regarding the State visit of the President of the PRC to the Republic of the Union of Myanmar

LIOH’s Statement regarding the State visit of the President of the People’s Republic of China to the Republic of the Union of Myanmar

17 January 2020

Land in Our Hands (LIOH) is a multi-ethnic national network of civil society organizations working for land issues, peasants’ unions and allies.

We, LIOH, heard that the President Xi Jinpin of the People’s Republic of China, is having a State visit to Myanmar during January 2020 and investment agreements will also be made during the visit; thus release the statement regarding them as follows.

  1. Land conflicts and forcible land grabbing in Myanmar remains unsolved and complicated till the present day. Existing land related regulatory & legislative frameworks and conflict settlement mechanisms do not have ability for solving those problems effectively and even legitimizing unjust land grabbing therefore creating more complications. It is threatening and making landlessness to internally displaced persons (IDPs) and ethnic peoples who are practicing customary land management systems.
  2. Investment projects (especially under China-Myanmar Economic Corridor – CMEC) are directly related with land problems; many of them remains unsolved till now. Local communities are rising their concerns upon upcoming projects and agreements – [especially countless people who are at risk of losing their land even without compensation as they practice customary land tenure systems which are excluded from legal protection].
  3. Moreover, the following are a few concluded findings on deciding, agreeing & implementing of projects under CMEC:
    • The decision making on the projects and agreements are excluding local communities, potentially affected peoples, ethnic political parties, ethnic armed organizations and civil society organizations.
    • Agreeing or signing the agreements for new projects while existing land conflicts unsolved poses the risks to both local communities and investors.
    • Armed conflicts widening in ethnic areas are obvious evidences of complicated land sector with many conflicts potentials.
    • Projects without transparency and lack of sufficient information are potential receiving public objections and potential of cultivating more corruptions.
    • Investments creating more conflicts would also damage bilateral diplomatic relations of two neighboring countries.
  4. Therefore, we (LIOH) demand the following points, in order to maintain the good relations between two neighboring countries;
    • The peoples from project affected areas, ethnic political parties and ethnic armed organizations must be in the first place along the course of designing, agreeing and implementing the projects.
    • Existing & upcoming projects have potentials creating complications on existing land conflicts thus must be accountable for it and for resolution prior to agreements & implementation.
    • Customary land tenure systems must be recognized and IDPs’ land rights must be fully guaranteed.
    • Land rights are human rights – China’s investment projects must be responsible & accountable for not uplifting human rights violations.
    • The investments must also be responsible & accountable for affecting ecosystems – as evidences of investment related environmental & ecological defects are already existed.
    • The projects and the projects from the areas without above conditions must be on hold.


1. Ko Si Thu         09790739488
2. Mi Kamoon     09401601822

Download LIOH’s Statement in Myanmar or English.

Related Statement (in Burmese language):

Internally Displaced Persons (IDP) and Refugee Right to Land Position Paper

21st August 2019


Since 2016 IDPs and refugees from different parts of the country, as well as the local frontline organizations that support them came together to discuss their land issues related to return and restitution in order to strengthen their advocacy on this issue.

Decades of war in Myanmar has resulted in the widespread displacement of ethnic nationality communities and undermining of their human rights including their right to land. Refugees and IDPs seeking justice, including the full and meaningful recognition of our right to land, face many challenges. With these challenges in mind, Internally Displaced Persons (IDP) and refugee communities from Mon, Karen, Karenni, Shan and Kachin States and from local civil society organisations(CSOs) that provide support to them, came together to share the challenges and experiences particularly regarding the IDP and refugee right to land and to deliberate on how to respond through a strategy of working together in the near future.

In this joint position paper, we first outline the similar and different situations we are facing, before proclaiming our basic principles and laying out our key demands. This position paper is a “living document”; with it, we do not claim to represent all IDPs and refugees, but rather we aspire to reach out, focus attention, generate discussion, and build political unity and momentum toward the full and meaningful recognition, restitution and protection of our IDP and refugee right to land.

Continue reading “Internally Displaced Persons (IDP) and Refugee Right to Land Position Paper”

Community Forest Forum released a Statement (July 2019)

The First Community Forest Forum was held in Hpa-an District, Karen State, Kawthoolei from July 1 to 3, 2019; contributing to forest conservation as well as the global warming and climate change solution. There were 244 participants in total including indigenous peoples, representatives from civil society organizations, Kawthoolei Forest Department (Central, District and Township levels) and representatives of community forest committees.

During 2011 to 2019, 151 community forests have been established in 7 Districts within Kawthoolei; altogether 244,588.03 acres in total area. The forum set out 18 missions regarding community forest and also urged the government to halt the one-sided projects and activities (such as amending land related laws, specifying national park and expanding the conservation areas) those undermine the community practices and affect the livelihoods of indigenous peoples.

The Statement is available in Burmese and Karen.

“Kaw” Customary Land Seminar Statement “Our Customary Land, Our Life and Our Future”

“Kaw” Customary Land Seminar Statement
“Our Customary Land, Our Life and Our Future”

May 30, 2019

Group photo of participants in “Kaw” (customary) Land Seminar; taken on 30 May 2019

The “Kaw” Customary Land Seminar, held from May 29th to 30th, 2019, at Lay Wah, in the Karen National Union (KNU) administrated area of Hpa-an District was attended by 519 representatives from 56 organizations, including: local community and civil society representatives, donors, INGOs, political parties, and leaders of the KNU. The seminar discussed the problems and challenges facing “Kaw” customary land systems and the ways in which they can be strengthened and promoted, collaborating with other stakeholders.

“Kaw” are Karen customary land management systems. This is land which is collectively used, managed, conserved and governed. These practices are based on the conservation of land, forest, water, and other natural resources, and emerge from a combination of traditional value systems and traditional/customary law. Therefore, these practices are inherently linked to the preservation of Karen culture and beliefs and local biodiversity and ecosystems protection.

Therefore, the collective preservation of land, forest, water, natural resources and the environment inherently requires the preservation and maintenance of Karen “Kaw” management systems. We must have well-developed and well-maintained “Kaw” management systems which address the challenges of the current political situation. As a result of this, the KNU land and forest policies include a full recognition of “Kaw” land management systems, and have set up and begun implementing policies.

Importantly, the “Kaw” (Customary) management systems have never been influenced by any external authorities; they are a deeply entwined set of land management practices, strong local administrative justice mechanisms and traditional beliefs which holistically come together. These beliefs and practices are representative of a comprehensive traditional relationship to land, from which has emerged a strong set of land management and governance practices which we call “Kaw”.

According to research conducted between 2015 and 2018, it was found that there are 198 “Kaw” customary land systems in Kawthoolei. Community-based research focused on three “Kaw” found that these customary land management systems successfully provided land protection and sustainable livelihoods, and they are still very much relevant and applicable to the current situation.

The current Myanmar government’s Vacant, Fallow and Virgin (VFV) Land Management Law and other land laws fundamentally undermine the authority of Karen “Kaw” customary land systems. These systems, in contrast with Myanmar government land laws, allow for collective participation in political decision-making. Suppressing such customary systems hinders the peace building process, preventing the establishment of federalism. The Myanmar government’s land laws therefore must be abolished and accordingly rewritten. In addition, we strongly oppose the current survey law (draft) which will hinder the peace building process while posing threats to the maintenance of “Kaw” Customary land systems.

Therefore, in order to have strong and effective realization of “Kaw” customary land governance systems, as independently allow to be governed and in line with the KNU’s land and forest policies, we make a firm commitment to continue to strengthen and implement the “Kaw” customary land governance systems within our administrative territories.


  • P’dohMahn Ba Tun – +66 613450533
  • P’doh Nay ThaBlay – +66 973503410
  • Saw Thuebee – +95 9785175874

Download the statement in English or Burmese.

LIOH’s Statement on Nationwide Movement Calling to Abolish Myitsone Dam Project

All of the large dam projects built in Myanmar have had severe and negative impacts on peoples’ lives, as a growing body of evidence clearly shows. We, Land in Our Hands (LIOH) network, oppose efforts to construct large dam projects, and call for the far-reaching damage to peoples’ lives caused by existing and under construction projects to be fully addressed.

The Ayeyarwaddy River is a major artery of Myanmar’s cultural heritage. We oppose any acts that attempt to place a financial value on the Ayeyarwaddy River, the Myitsone and the larger river basin, whether it is calculated in kyat, dollars, euros or yuan. The Ayeyarwaddy is not for sale!

Plans and actions which support the conversion of the Ayeyarwaddy River and the Myitsone into electric megawatts are insulting to ethnic peoples residing in these areas, and continues to drive the country further from national reconciliation and sustainable peace.

We clearly warn that the five-year government does not have the authority to decide the future of societies living at the Myitsone or along the Ayeyarwaddy River and its basin.

We demand that the current government completely abolish the Myitsone Dam project, and the other 6 dams in the cascade, within its remaining 2-years term.

We denounce the Myitsone project proponents, including the Chinese Government and its State Owned Enterprises, for their attempts to force the project forward in a clear sign of disregard for the will of the people of Myanmar. We demand the immediate abolishment of Myitsone Dam project and the full restitution of land and livelihoods to those who have already suffered displacement and dispossession.

(Download statement in English or Burmese)

LIOH Statement regarding the World Bank’s 2019 conference on Land and Poverty

LIOH Statement regarding the World Bank’s 2019 conference on Land and Poverty

25 March 2019

From the 25-29 the World Bank is hosting its annual conference on “Land and Poverty Conference 2019”.  This conference is pitched as a platform for experts to gather and present on solutions to the world’s land issues, including those afflicting Myanmar’s people today.

We, the Land in Our Hands, [a multi-ethnic national network in partnership with civil society and community based organizations across Myanmar], firmly believes that the World bank is the wrong institution to be leading communities out of land related poverty at a global scale, and has a major conflict of interests as the Bank has arguably exacerbated land related inequality through its investments and structural adjustment programs.

Myanmar is facing a serious land crisis that has been built on decades of successive military government’s systematic and widespread land expropriations from the country’s people. The current semi-civilian government, led by the NLD, has followed in the footsteps of previous authoritarian dictatorships in attempting to corner land as an investment opportunity while ignoring the history of land expropriations and how they continue to fan the flames of inequality, conflict and poverty. 

Sadly, the NLD-led government’s land reforms are deepening the existing land tenure insecurities of millions of farmers across the country, and foreclosing opportunities for genuine federal democratic reforms and lasting peace.

The recently amended Vacant Fallow Virgin Land Management Law effectively designates 45 million acres of land in Myanmar as “untitled” or vacant land, leaving it open for investment – 82 per cent of this land lies in non-Bamar ethnic States. There is no such thing as vacant land in Myanmar, and by ignoring the diversity of existing land tenure systems practiced by local farming communities, this law will transform these farmers into landless criminals, deprive them of their livelihoods and strip them of their cultural heritage and identity. In response to this situation, 346 CSOs across Myanmar (; the ethnic political parties ( and war affected displaced community from Kachin ( issued statements calling on the Myanmar government to repeal the VFVL law.

Land conflicts that are now emerging throughout the country will worsen as foreign companies, supported by foreign governments and International financial institutions, rush in to profit before any meaningful or far-reaching political and economic reforms have taken root in Myanmar. The World Bank’s engagement in the Myanmar land issue will lead to an acceleration of land grabbing and compound the dispossession of local communities from their lands and resources; and further fuel conflict and rights violations including displacement in Myanmar.

Contact,, +95-9785175874

Download (English) (Myanmar)

PSLF’s Statement on VFVL

Palaung State Liberation Front (PSLF) / Ta’ang National Liberation Army (TNLA) released a statement on the Vacant, Fallow & Virgin Land Management Law (VFVL) on 11th March 2019. The statement is claiming that the peoples living & making lives on the land are the original owner of the land thus no need to use the VFVL; reminding the peoples from Ta’ang area to claim back the lands grabbed previously; promising PSLF/TNLA would uphold land policy that protect the community from losing land and would take actions against those any individual or organization attempting to grab the land from its people.